9/18/2023 0 Comments Ivi tv![]() ![]() ![]() Moreover, ivi tv is said to offer the simplicity of traditional TV together with 'innovative opportunities' offered by VOD. įox News host suggests Trump may have leaked audio in classified documents. Why Europe and America are going in opposite directions on youth transgender. White House picks fight with Greene over funding Jesse Watters: five things to know about the rising Fox News starĭeSantis suggests he would eliminate several federal agencies, including IRS RFK Jr.: 'I’m proud that President Trump likes me' UPS Teamsters say nationwide strike is ‘imminent’ if Friday deadline not metĭeSantis vetoes GOP-backed criminal justice reform billīiden administration announces $7 billion residential solar grant programĭoorDash updates to include a minimum hourly wage for drivers Hunter Biden IRS whistleblower defends claims that counter DOJ statementsīiden mocks Tuberville for touting broadband funding he voted againstĪmericans are hiding their credit card debt Will the Supreme Court strike down debt forgiveness? Retirement talk surrounding Thomas, Alito raises stakes for 2024 election Student debt relief: Which way will the Supreme Court go?Ĭongress doubles down on explosive claims of illegal UFO retrieval programs This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. A spokesman for ivi told Bloomberg the decision “is not the final chapter to this story.”Ĭopyright 2023 Nexstar Media Inc. “This confirms that Congress never intended to allow Internet providers to retransmit broadcast programming without the consent of copyright owners,” said Dennis Wharton, spokesman for the National Association of Broadcasters.īut ivi may have some fight left in it. The National Association of Broadcasters lauded the federal appeals court’s decision to uphold the injunction. Ivi’s service would let some subscribers watch TV programs before they played live on their local broadcast stations, which the judges said would undercut the value of the copyright owners’ programming and undermine “existing and prospective retransmission fees, negotiations, and agreements.” “These harms would extend to other copyright holders of television programming.” Without an injunction against ivi’s service, “the quantity and quality of efforts put into creating television programming, retransmission and advertising revenues, distribution models and schedules - all would be adversely affected,” the panel of appeals court judges argued. Congress had also not intended for compulsory licenses to be extended to Internet retransmission services like ivi, the court said. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals noted that the Copyright Office had previously decided that Internet retransmission services are not cable systems and therefore not eligible for a compulsory license, which lets cable systems skip negotiating individual programming licenses with copyright owners. Subscribers could record, pause, fast forward and rewind ivi’s streams for an additional 99 cents each month.Īccording to the Copyright Act, cable systems are allowed to retransmit signals of copyrighted TV programming to subscribers, but for a royalty fee. Ivi livestreamed copyrighted TV programs over the Web on its so-called TV player for a monthly subscription fee of $4.99. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |